[ad_1]
Creutzig, F. et al. Towards demand-side options for mitigating local weather change. Nat. Clim. Change 8, 260–263 (2018).
Google Scholar
McCollum, D. L. et al. Connecting the sustainable improvement targets by their energy inter-linkages. Environ. Res. Lett. 13, 033006 (2018).
Google Scholar
Ürge-Vorsatz, D., Herrero, S. T., Dubash, N. Okay. & Lecocq, F. Measuring the co-benefits of local weather change mitigation. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 39, 549–582 (2014).
Google Scholar
Grubler, A. et al. A low energy demand state of affairs for assembly the 1.5 °C goal and sustainable improvement targets with out unfavourable emission applied sciences. Nat. Energy 3, 515–527 (2018).
Google Scholar
Vita, G., Rao, N. D., Usubiaga-Liano, A., Min, J. & Wood, R. Durable items drive two-thirds of worldwide households’ last energy footprints. Environ. Sci. Technol. 55, 3175–3187 (2021).
Google Scholar
Hertwich, E. G. & Peters, G. P. Carbon footprint of countries: a world, trade-linked evaluation. Environ. Sci. Technol. 43, 6414–6420 (2009).
Google Scholar
Veblen, T. The Theory of the Leisure Class (Houghton Mifflin, 1973).
Max-Neef, M. A. Human Scale Development: Conception, Application and Further Reflections (Apex Press, 1991).
Kahneman, D. & Deaton, A. High revenue improves analysis of life however not emotional well-being. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 16489–16493 (2010).
Google Scholar
Kahneman, D., Krueger, A. B., Schkade, D., Schwarz, N. & Stone, A. A. Would you be happier for those who have been richer? A focusing phantasm. Science 312, 1908–1910 (2006).
Google Scholar
Mazur, A. & Rosa, E. Energy and life-style. Science 186, 607–610 (1974).
Google Scholar
Milanovic, B. Worlds Apart: Measuring International and Global Inequality (Princeton Univ. Press, 2005).
Costanza, R. Time to depart GDP behind. Nature 505, 283–285 (2014).
Google Scholar
Steinberger, J. Okay. & Roberts, J. T. From constraint to sufficiency: the decoupling of energy and carbon from human wants, 1975–2005. Ecol. Econ. 70, 425–433 (2010).
Google Scholar
Arto, I., Capellán-Pérez, I., Lago, R., Bueno, G. & Bermejo, R. The energy necessities of a developed world. Energy Sustain. Dev. 33, 1–13 (2016).
Google Scholar
Knight, Okay. W. & Rosa, E. A. The environmental effectivity of well-being: a cross-national evaluation. Soc. Sci. Res. 40, 931–949 (2011).
Google Scholar
Rao, N. D., Min, J. & Mastrucci, A. Energy necessities for first rate residing in India, Brazil and South Africa. Nat. Energy 4, 1025–1032 (2019).
Google Scholar
Millward-Hopkins, J., Steinberger, J. Okay., Rao, N. D. & Oswald, Y. Providing first rate residing with minimal energy: a world state of affairs. Global Environ. Change 65, 102168 (2020).
Google Scholar
Di Giulio, A. & Fuchs, D. Sustainable consumption corridors: idea, objections, and responses. GAIA 23, 184–192 (2014).
Google Scholar
Rosa, E., Machlis, G. & Keating, Okay. Energy and society. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 14, 149–172 (1988).
Google Scholar
Herendeen, R. & Tanaka, J. Energy price of residing. Energy 1, 165–178 (1976).
Google Scholar
van Beek, L., Hajer, M., Pelzer, P., van Vuuren, D. & Cassen, C. Anticipating futures by means of fashions: the rise of built-in evaluation modelling within the local weather science–coverage interface since 1970. Glob. Environ. Change 65, 102191 (2020).
Google Scholar
Keppo, I. et al. Exploring the likelihood house: taking inventory of the various capabilities and gaps in built-in evaluation fashions. Environ. Res. Lett. 16, 053006 (2021).
Google Scholar
Pachauri, S. et al. Pathways to realize common family entry to trendy energy by 2030. Environ. Res. Lett. 8, 024015 (2013).
Google Scholar
Kalt, G., Wiedenhofer, D., Görg, C. & Haberl, H. Conceptualizing energy providers: a overview of energy and well-being alongside the Energy Service Cascade. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 53, 47–58 (2019).
Google Scholar
Kowsari, R. & Zerriffi, H. Three dimensional energy profile: a conceptual framework for assessing family energy use. Energy Policy 39, 7505–7517 (2011).
Google Scholar
Wilson, C. & Dowlatabadi, H. Models of choice making and residential energy use. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 32, 169–203 (2007).
Google Scholar
McCollum, D. L. et al. Improving the behavioral realism of worldwide built-in evaluation fashions: an software to shoppers’ car selections. Transp. Res. D 55, 322–342 (2017).
Google Scholar
Oswald, Y., Owen, A. & Steinberger, J. Okay. Large inequality in worldwide and intranational energy footprints between revenue teams and throughout consumption classes. Nat. Energy 5, 231–239 (2020).
Google Scholar
Mastrucci, A., Min, J., Usubiaga-Liaño, A. & Rao, N. D. A framework for modelling consumption-based energy demand and emission pathways. Environ. Sci. Technol. 54, 1799–1807 (2020).
Google Scholar
Ivanova, D. et al. Environmental influence evaluation of family consumption. J. Ind. Ecol. 20, 526–536 (2016).
Google Scholar
Lan, J., Malik, A., Lenzen, M., McBain, D. & Kanemoto, Okay. A structural decomposition evaluation of worldwide energy footprints. Appl. Energy 163, 436–451 (2016).
Google Scholar
Zhong, W., Song, J., Yang, W., Fang, Okay. & Liu, X. Evolving family consumption-driven industrial energy consumption below urbanization: a dynamic enter–output evaluation. J. Clean. Prod. 289, 125732 (2021).
Google Scholar
Wilson, C., Kerr, L., Sprei, F., Vrain, E. & Wilson, M. Potential local weather advantages of digital shopper improvements. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 45, 113–144 (2020).
Google Scholar
Milnar, M. & Ramaswami, A. Impact of city growth and in situ greenery on community-wide carbon emissions: methodology improvement and insights from 11 US cities. Environ. Sci. Technol. 54, 16086–16096 (2020).
Google Scholar
Tong, Okay., Nagpure, A. S. & Ramaswami, A. All city areas’ energy use knowledge throughout 640 districts in India for the 12 months 2011. Sci. Data 8, 104 (2021).
Google Scholar
Zheng, H. et al. Linking metropolis‐degree enter–output desk to city energy footprint: development framework and software. J. Ind. Ecol. 23, 781–795 (2019).
Google Scholar
Chen, S. & Chen, B. Urban energy consumption: completely different insights from energy circulation evaluation, enter–output evaluation and ecological community evaluation. Appl. Energy 138, 99–107 (2015).
Google Scholar
Global Energy Assessment—Toward a Sustainable Future (International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, 2012).
Chen, S., Zhu, F., Long, H. & Yang, J. Energy footprint managed by city calls for: how a lot does provide chain complexity contribute? Energy 183, 561–572 (2019).
Google Scholar
Office for National Statistics. An overview of existence and wider traits linked to wholesome life expectancy in England: June 2017. Oxf. Bull. Econ. Stat. 72, 717–743 (2017).
Agnew, M., Pettifor, H. & Wilson, C. Lifestyles in Public Health, Marketing and Pro-environmental Research (Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research, 2020).
Schipper, L., Bartlett, L., Hawk, D. & Vine, E. Linking life-styles and energy use: a matter of time? Annu. Rev. Energy 14, 273–320 (1989).
Google Scholar
Lutzenhiser, L. Social and behavioral facets of energy use. Annu. Rev. Energy Environ. 18, 247–289 (1993).
Google Scholar
Graham, H. & White, P. C. Social determinants and existence: integrating environmental and public well being views. Public Health 141, 270–278 (2016).
Google Scholar
Jensen, M. Lifestyle: suggesting mechanisms and a definition from a cognitive science perspective. Environ. Dev. Sustain. 11, 215–228 (2007).
Google Scholar
Giddens, A. Modernity and Self-Identity: Self and Society within the Late Modern Age (Stanford Univ. Press, 1991).
Chen, C. et al. Energy consumption and carbon footprint accounting of city and rural residents in Beijing by means of Consumer Lifestyle Approach. Ecol. Indic. 98, 575–586 (2019).
Google Scholar
Hayward, B. & Roy, J. Sustainable residing: bridging the North-South divide in existence and consumption debates. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 44, 157–175 (2019).
Google Scholar
Watts, N. et al. The 2019 report of The Lancet Countdown on well being and local weather change: guaranteeing that the well being of a kid born immediately shouldn’t be outlined by a altering local weather. Lancet 394, 1836–1878 (2019).
Google Scholar
Brown, H. S. & Vergragt, P. J. From consumerism to wellbeing: towards a cultural transition? J. Clean. Prod. 132, 308–317 (2016).
Google Scholar
Zamani, B., Sandin, G. & Peters, G. M. Life cycle evaluation of clothes libraries: can collaborative consumption cut back the environmental influence of quick trend? J. Clean. Prod. 162, 1368–1375 (2017).
Google Scholar
Yang, H., Ma, M., Thompson, J. R. & Flower, R. J. Waste administration, casual recycling, environmental air pollution and public well being. J. Epidemiol. Community Health 72, 237–243 (2018).
Google Scholar
Creutzig, F. et al. Beyond know-how: demand-side options for local weather change mitigation. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 41, 173–198 (2016).
Google Scholar
Akenji, L. & Chen, H. A Framework for Shaping Sustainable Lifestyles: Determinants and Strategies (United Nations Environmental Programme, 2016).
Sanquist, T. F., Orr, H., Shui, B. & Bittner, A. C. Lifestyle elements in U.S. residential electrical energy consumption. Energy Policy 42, 354–364 (2012).
Google Scholar
Rao, N. D. & Ummel, Okay. White items for white folks? Drivers of electrical equipment progress in rising economies. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 27, 106–116 (2017).
Google Scholar
Andersson, D., Nässén, J., Larsson, J. & Holmberg, J. Greenhouse fuel emissions and subjective well-being: an evaluation of Swedish households. Ecol. Econ. 102, 75–82 (2014).
Google Scholar
Ambrey, C. L. & Daniels, P. Happiness and footprints: assessing the connection between particular person well-being and carbon footprints. Environ. Dev. Sustain. 19, 895–920 (2016).
Google Scholar
Verhofstadt, E., Van Ootegem, L., Defloor, B. & Bleys, B. Linking people’ ecological footprint to their subjective well-being. Ecol. Econ. 127, 80–89 (2016).
Google Scholar
Lenzen, M. & Cummins, R. Happiness versus the surroundings—a case examine of Australian existence. Challenges 4, 56–74 (2013).
Google Scholar
Zidanšek, A. Sustainable improvement and happiness in nations. Energy 32, 891–897 (2007).
Google Scholar
York, R., Rosa, E. & Dietz, T. The ecological footprint depth of nationwide economies. J. Ind. Ecol. 8, 139–154 (2005).
Google Scholar
Venhoeven, L. A., Bolderdijk, J. W. & Steg, L. Why performing environmentally-friendly feels good: exploring the position of self-image. Front. Psychol. 7, 1846 (2016).
Google Scholar
Brown, Okay. W. & Kasser, T. Are psychological and ecological well-being suitable? The position of values, mindfulness, and way of life. Soc. Indic. Res. 74, 349–368 (2005).
Google Scholar
Lambert, L. et al. Towards a higher world understanding of wellbeing: a proposal for a extra inclusive measure. Int. J. Wellbeing 10, 1–18 (2020).
Google Scholar
Barger, S. D., Donoho, C. J. & Wayment, H. A. The relative contributions of race/ethnicity, socioeconomic standing, well being, and social relationships to life satisfaction within the United States. Qual. Life Res. 18, 179–189 (2009).
Google Scholar
Wachs, M. Transportation coverage, poverty, and sustainability: historical past and future. Transp. Res. Rec. 2163, 5–12 (2010).
Google Scholar
Douglas, I. Urban ecology and city ecosystems: understanding the hyperlinks to human well being and well-being. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain. 4, 385–392 (2012).
Google Scholar
Agusdinata, D. B., Liu, W., Eakin, H. & Romero, H. Socio-environmental impacts of lithium mineral extraction: in direction of a research agenda. Environ. Res. Lett. 13, 12 (2018).
Google Scholar
Rao, N., Kiesewetter, G., Min, J., Pachauri, S. & Wagner, F. Household contributions to and impacts from air air pollution in India. Nat. Sustain. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-021-00744-0 (2021).
Stillman, T. F., Fincham, F. D., Vohs, Okay. D., Lambert, N. M. & Phillips, C. A. The materials and immaterial in battle: spirituality reduces conspicuous consumption. J. Econ. Psychol. 33, 1–7 (2012).
Google Scholar
Ruggles, S. Big microdata for inhabitants research. Demography 51, 287–297 (2014).
Google Scholar
Zhang, W. et al. Estimating residential energy consumption in metropolitan areas: a microsimulation method. Energy 155, 162–173 (2018).
Google Scholar
Kallis, G. In defence of degrowth. Ecol. Econ. 70, 873–880 (2011).
Google Scholar
Hickel, J. What does degrowth imply? A couple of factors of clarification. Globalizations https://doi.org/10.1080/14747731.2020.1812222 (2020).
Keysser, L. T. & Lenzen, M. 1.5 °C degrowth eventualities counsel the necessity for brand spanking new mitigation pathways. Nat. Commun. 12, 2676 (2021).
Google Scholar
Knutti, R. Closing the data–motion hole in local weather change. One Earth 1, 21–23 (2019).
Google Scholar
[ad_2]
