ADVERTISEMENT

For Coronavirus Testing, the Nose May Not Always Be Best

548
SHARES
2.5k
VIEWS


Saliva additionally has trade-offs. While the virus seems to construct up in saliva early, the nostril could also be a greater place to detect it later in the course of an infection.

Researchers at the California Institute of Technology discovered that whereas the virus typically spiked first in saliva, it finally rose to larger ranges in the nostril. Their outcomes recommend that extremely delicate exams, like P.C.R. exams, could possibly decide up infections in saliva days sooner than they do in nasal swabs, however that less-sensitive exams, like antigen exams, won’t.

The information on saliva are nonetheless blended, some specialists famous.

“There are these few studies that I have found really very interesting,” mentioned Dr. Mary Okay. Hayden, an infectious illness physician and scientific microbiologist at Rush University Medical Center in Chicago.

But Dr. Hayden mentioned she was deciphering the new research cautiously as a result of “for years and years and years,” analysis has instructed that nasopharyngeal specimens are finest for detecting respiratory viruses.

Some scientists even have sensible considerations. The mouth is “a little more of an uncontrolled environment compared to the nasal passages,” mentioned Joseph DeRisi, a biochemist at the University of California, San Francisco, who’s a president of the Chan Zuckerberg Biohub and an creator of the cheek swab paper. “Did you drink a Coke right before you took the test? The pH will be different. And those things matter.”

Saliva might be “viscous and difficult to work with,” particularly when sufferers are sick and dehydrated, Dr. Marie-Louise Landry, director of the scientific virology laboratory at Yale New Haven Hospital, mentioned in an e-mail.

Ultimately, totally different approaches could also be required in several circumstances. For individuals who have had signs for a number of days, nasal swabs may be a sensible choice, whereas saliva may be finest fitted to the large-scale surveillance screening of asymptomatic folks, Dr. Hansen instructed. “We need to get the right test into the right places,” he mentioned.