For the primary time, Colombia can have a leftist president.
Gustavo Petro, a former insurgent and a longtime senator who has pledged to rework the nation’s financial system, has received Sunday’s election, in accordance with preliminary outcomes, setting the third largest nation in Latin America on a radically new path.
Mr. Petro acquired greater than 50 p.c of the vote, with greater than 99 p.c counted Sunday night. His opponent, Rodolfo Hernández, a building magnate who had energized the nation with a scorched-earth anti-corruption platform, simply over 47 p.c.
Shortly after the vote, Mr. Hernández conceded to Mr. Petro.
“Colombians, today the majority of citizens have chosen the other candidate,” he instructed his supporters in Bucaramanga. “As I said during the campaign, I accept the results of this election.”
Just over 58 p.c of Colombia’s 39 million voters turned out to forged a poll, in accordance with official figures.
Mr. Petro’s victory displays widespread discontent in Colombia, a rustic of fifty million, with poverty and inequality on the rise and widespread dissatisfaction with an absence of alternative, points that despatched a whole bunch of hundreds of individuals to reveal within the streets final 12 months.
“The entire country is begging for change,” mentioned Fernando Posada, a Colombian political scientist, “and that is absolutely clear.”
The win is all of the extra important due to the nation’s historical past. For many years, the federal government fought a brutal leftist insurgency generally known as the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia, or FARC, with the stigma from the battle making it troublesome for a authentic left to flourish.
But the FARC signed a peace cope with the federal government in 2016, laying down their arms and opening house for a broader political discourse.
Mr. Petro had been a part of a unique insurgent group, known as the M-19, which demobilized in 1990, and have become a political occasion that helped rewrite the nation’s structure.
Both Mr. Petro and Mr. Hernández beat Federico Gutiérrez, a former huge metropolis mayor backed by the conservative elite, in a primary spherical of voting on May 29, sending them to a runoff.
Both males had billed themselves as anti-establishment candidates, saying they have been operating towards a political class that had managed the nation for generations.
Among the components that almost all distinguished them was how they considered the foundation of the nation’s issues.
Mr. Petro believes the financial system is damaged, overly reliant on oil export and a flourishing and unlawful cocaine enterprise that he mentioned has made the wealthy richer and poor poorer. He is asking for a halt to all new oil exploration, a shift to growing different industries, and an enlargement of social applications, whereas imposing larger taxes on the wealthy.
“What we have today is the result of what I call ‘the depletion of the model,’” Mr. Petro mentioned in an interview, referring to the present financial system. “The end result is a brutal poverty.”
His bold financial plan has, nevertheless, raised considerations. One former finance minister called his power plan “economic suicide.”
Mr. Petro will take workplace in August, and can face urgent points with international repercussions: Lack of alternative and rising violence, which have prompted document numbers of Colombians emigrate to the United States in latest months; excessive ranges of deforestation within the Colombian Amazon, a vital buffer towards local weather change; and rising threats to democracy, a part of a pattern across the area.
He will face a deeply polarized society the place polls present rising mistrust in virtually all main establishments.
Mr. Petro might additionally reshape Colombia’s relationship with the United States.
For many years, Colombia has been Washington’s strongest ally in Latin America, forming the cornerstone of its safety coverage within the area. During his marketing campaign, Mr. Petro promised to reassess that relationship, together with essential collaborations on medicine, Venezuela and commerce.
In the interview, Mr. Petro mentioned his relationship with the United States would give attention to working collectively to sort out local weather change, particularly halting the fast erosion of the Amazon.
“There is a point of dialogue there,” he mentioned. “Because saving the Amazon rainforest involves some instruments, some programs, that do not exist today, at least not with respect to the United States.”
Megan Janetsky contributed reporting from Bucaramanga, Colombia, and Sofía Villamil and Genevieve Glatsky contributed reporting from Bogotá.