IPCC Special Report on Global Warming of 1.5 °C (eds Masson-Delmotte, V. et al.) (WMO, 2018).
Anderson, C. M. et al. Natural climate options will not be sufficient. Science 363, 933–934 (2019).
Carton, W., Lund, J. F. & Dooley, Okay. Undoing equivalence: rethinking carbon accounting for simply carbon elimination. Front. Clim. 3, 30 (2021).
Seddon, N. et al. Getting the message proper on nature-based options to climate change. Glob. Change Biol. 27, 1518–1546 (2021).
Griscom, B. W. et al. We want each pure and power options to stabilize our climate. Glob. Change Biol. 25, 1889–1890 (2019).
Fargione, J. et al. Natural climate options for the United States. Sci. Adv. 4, eaat1869 (2018).
Drever, C. R. et al. Natural climate options for Canada. Sci. Adv. 7, eabd6034 (2021).
Griscom, B. W. et al. Natural climate options. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, 11645–11650 (2017).
Fuss, S. et al. Negative emissions—Part 2: prices, potentials and unintended effects. Environ. Res. Lett. 13, 63002 (2018).
Gregorio, N. et al. in Enhancing Food Security Through Forest Landscape Restoration: Lessons from Burkina Faso, Brazil, Guatemala, Viet Nam, Ghana, Ethiopia and Philippines (eds Kumar, C. et al.) 174–217 (IUCN, 2015).
Meyer, J. M. Gifford Pinchot, John Muir, and the boundaries of politics in American thought. Polity 30, 267–284 (1997).
Standard on Biodiversity Offsets (BBOP, 2012).
Performance Standard 6: Biodiversity Conservation and Sustainable Management of Natural Resources (IFC, 2012).
Arlidge, W. N. S. et al. A worldwide mitigation hierarchy for nature conservation. Bioscience 68, 336–347 (2018).
Science-Based Targets for Nature: Initial Guidance for Business (Science Based Targets Network, 2020).
Seddon, N. et al. Understanding the worth and limits of nature-based options to climate change and different world challenges. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 375, 20190120 (2020).
Ellis, P. W. et al. Reduced-impact logging for climate change mitigation (RIL-C) can halve selective logging emissions from tropical forests. Ecol. Manag. 438, 255–266 (2019).
Martin, D. M. Ecological restoration needs to be redefined for the twenty-first century. Restor. Ecol. 25, 668–673 (2017).
Veldman, J. W. et al. Where tree planting and forest enlargement are unhealthy for biodiversity and ecosystem companies. Bioscience 65, 1011–1018 (2015).
Supporting Canadians and Fighting COVID-19 (Department of Finance Canada, 2020).
Roe, S. et al. Contribution of the land sector to a 1.5 °C world. Nat. Clim. Change 9, 817–828 (2019).
Seddon, N. et al. Nature-Based Solutions in Nationally Determined Contributions: Synthesis and Recommendations for Enhancing Climate Ambition and Action by 2020 (IUCN, 2019).
Carbon Removal Corporate Action Tracker (Institute for Carbon Removal Law and Policy, accessed 6 July 2021); https://research.american.edu/carbonremoval/2020/05/07/carbon-removal-corporate-action-tracker/
Pendrill, F. et al. Agricultural and forestry commerce drives massive share of tropical deforestation emissions. Glob. Environ. Change 56, 1–10 (2019).
Goal 1 Assessment: Striving to End Natural Forest Loss (NYDF Progress Assessment Secretariat, 2020).
Smith, B. One 12 months later: The path to carbon unfavourable—a progress report on our climate ‘moonshot’. Microsoft Blog (28 January 2021); https://blogs.microsoft.com/blog/2021/01/28/one-year-later-the-path-to-carbon-negative-a-progress-report-on-our-climate-moonshot/
Ward, C. et al. Smallholder perceptions of land restoration actions: rewetting tropical peatland oil palm areas in Sumatra. Indonesia. Reg. Environ. Change 21, 1 (2020).
Jacobson, M. & Ham, C. The (un)damaged promise of agroforestry: a case examine of improved fallows in Zambia. Environ. Dev. Sustain. 22, 8247–8260 (2020).
West, T. A. P., Börner, J., Sills, E. O. & Kontoleon, A. Overstated carbon emission reductions from voluntary REDD+ initiatives within the Brazilian Amazon. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci USA 117, 24188–24194 (2020).
Cook-Patton, S. C. et al. Lower value and extra possible choices to restore forest cowl within the contiguous United States for climate mitigation. One Earth 3, 739–752 (2020).
Petersen, S. O., Højberg, O., Poulsen, M., Schwab, C. & Eriksen, J. Methanogenic neighborhood adjustments, and emissions of methane and different gases, throughout storage of acidified and untreated pig slurry. J. Appl. Microbiol. 117, 160–172 (2014).
Günther, A. et al. Prompt rewetting of drained peatlands reduces climate warming regardless of methane emissions. Nat. Commun. 11, 1644 (2020).
Qin, Z. et al. Delayed influence of pure climate options. Glob. Change Biol. 27, 215–217 (2021).
Anderegg, W. R. L. et al. Climate-driven dangers to the climate mitigation potential of forests. Science 368, eaaz7005 (2020).
Pagiola, S., Honey-Rosés, J. & Freire-González, J. Assessing the permanence of land-use change induced by funds for environmental companies: proof from Nicaragua. Trop. Conserv. Sci. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940082920922676 (2020).
Tseng, T.-W. J. et al. Influence of land tenure interventions on human well-being and environmental outcomes. Nat. Sustain. 4, 242–251 (2021).
Smith, P. et al. Impacts of land-based greenhouse fuel elimination choices on ecosystem companies and the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 44, 255–286 (2019).
Nunez, S., Verboom, J. & Alkemade, R. Assessing land-based mitigation implications for biodiversity. Environ. Sci. Policy 106, 68–76 (2020).
Chausson, A. et al. Mapping the effectiveness of nature-based options for climate change adaptation. Glob. Change Biol. 26, 6134–6155 (2020).
Infield, M., Entwistle, A., Anthem, H., Mugisha, A. & Phillips, Okay. Reflections on cultural values approaches to conservation: classes from 20 years of implementation. Oryx 52, 220–230 (2018).
Rosenstock, T. S. et al. A planetary well being perspective on agroforestry in sub-Saharan Africa. One Earth 1, 330–344 (2019).
Garrett, H. E. et al. Hardwood silvopasture administration in North America. Agrofor. Syst. 61, 21–33 (2004).
Kroeger, T. et al. Returns on funding in watershed conservation: software of a greatest practices analytical framework to the Rio Camboriú Water Producer program, Santa Catarina, Brazil. Sci. Total Environ. 657, 1368–1381 (2019).
Lamb, D., Erskine, P. D. & Parrotta, J. A. Restoration of degraded tropical forest landscapes. Science 310, 1628–1632 (2005).
Ferreira, J. et al. Carbon-focused conservation could fail to guard probably the most biodiverse tropical forests. Nat. Clim. Change 8, 744–749 (2018).
Cook-Patton, S. C. et al. Mapping carbon accumulation potential from world pure forest regrowth. Nature 585, 545–550 (2020).
Wilson, S. J., Schelhas, J., Grau, R., Nanni, A. S. & Sloan, S. Forest ecosystem-service transitions: the ecological dimensions of the forest transition. Ecol. Soc. 22, 38 (2017).
Funk, J. M. et al. Securing the climate advantages of secure forests. Clim. Policy 19, 845–860 (2019).
Keith, H. et al. Evaluating nature-based options for climate mitigation and conservation requires complete carbon accounting. Sci. Total Environ. 769, 144341 (2021).
Moomaw, W. R., Masino, S. A. & Faison, E. Okay. Intact forests within the United States: proforestation mitigates climate change and serves the best good. Front. For. Glob. Change 2, 27 (2019).
Hiraishi, T. et al. 2013 Supplement to the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories: Wetlands (WMO, 2013).
Goldstein, A. et al. Protecting irrecoverable carbon in Earth’s ecosystems. Nat. Clim. Change 10, 287–295 (2020).
Griscom, B. W. et al. National mitigation potential from pure climate options within the tropics. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 375, 20190126 (2020).
Busch, J. et al. Potential for low-cost carbon dioxide elimination by tropical reforestation. Nat. Clim. Change 9, 463–466 (2019).
Vargas Zeppetello, L. R. et al. Large scale tropical deforestation drives excessive warming. Environ. Res. Lett. 15, 84012 (2020).
Spalding, M. D. et al. The function of ecosystems in coastal safety: adapting to climate change and coastal hazards. Ocean Coast. Manag. 90, 50–57 (2014).
Watson, J. E. M. et al. The distinctive worth of intact forest ecosystems. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 2, 599–610 (2018).
Global Assessment Report on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES, 2019).
Dobson, A. P. et al. Ecology and economics for pandemic prevention. Science 369, 379–381 (2020).
Streck, C. REDD+ and leakage: debunking myths and selling built-in options. Clim. Policy 21, 843–852 (2021).
Brancalion, P. H. S. et al. The value of restoring carbon shares in Brazil’s Atlantic Forest. Land Degrad. Dev. 32, 830–841 (2021).
Bustamante-Sánchez, M. A. & Armesto, J. J. Seed limitation throughout early forest succession in a rural panorama on Chiloé Island, Chile: implications for temperate forest restoration. J. Appl. Ecol. 49, 1103–1112 (2012).
Koch, A., Brierley, C. & Lewis, S. L. Effects of Earth system feedbacks on the potential mitigation of large-scale tropical forest restoration. Biogeosciences 18, 2627–2647 (2021).
Zickfeld, Okay., Azevedo, D., Mathesius, S. & Matthews, H. D. Asymmetry within the climate–carbon cycle response to optimistic and unfavourable CO2 emissions. Nat. Clim. Change 11, 613–617 (2021).
Johnson, Okay. A. et al. A profit–value evaluation of floodplain land acquisition for US flood injury discount. Nat. Sustain. 3, 56–62 (2020).
Nolte, C. High-resolution land worth maps reveal underestimation of conservation prices within the United States. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 117, 29577–29583 (2020).
Reetz, H., Heffer, P. & Bruulsema, T. in Managing Water and Fertilizer for Sustainable Agricultural Intensification (eds Drechsel, P. et al.) 65–86 (IFA, IWMI, IPNI and IPI, 2015).
Sharma, P. et al. The function of canopy crops in direction of sustainable soil well being and agriculture—a evaluate paper. Am. J. Plant Sci. 09, 1935–1951 (2018).
Bergeron, M. et al. Reduced soil nutrient leaching following the institution of tree-based intercropping programs in jap Canada. Agrofor. Syst. 83, 321–330 (2011).
Moore, A. A. & Palmer, M. A. Invertebrate biodiveristy in agricultural and city headwater streams: implications for conservation and administration. Ecol. Appl. 15, 1169–1177 (2005).
Martin, M. P. et al. People plant bushes for utility extra typically than for biodiversity or carbon. Biol. Conserv. 261, 109224 (2021).
Mendes, T. P., de Assis Montag, L. F., Alvarado, S. T. & Juen, L. Assessing habitat high quality on alpha and beta range of Odonata larvae (Insect) in logging areas in Amazon forest. Hydrobiologia 848, 1147–1161 (2021).
Crouzeilles, R. et al. Achieving cost-effective landscape-scale forest restoration by focused pure regeneration. Conserv. Lett. 13, e12709 (2020).
Gilroy, J. J. et al. Cheap carbon and biodiversity co-benefits from forest regeneration in a hotspot of endemism. Nat. Clim. Change 4, 503–507 (2014).
Riahi, Okay. et al. The Shared Socioeconomic Pathways and their power, land use, and greenhouse fuel emissions implications: an outline. Glob. Environ. Change 42, 153–168 (2017).
Strassburg, B. B. N. et al. Strategic approaches to restoring ecosystems can triple conservation good points and halve prices. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 3, 62–70 (2019).
Taillardat, P., Thompson, B. S., Garneau, M., Trottier, Okay. & Friess, D. A. Climate change mitigation potential of wetlands and the cost-effectiveness of their restoration. Interface Focus 10, 20190129 (2020).
Xu, S., Liu, X., Li, X. & Tian, C. Soil natural carbon adjustments following wetland restoration: a world meta-analysis. Geoderma 353, 89–96 (2019).
Holl, Okay. D. & Brancalion, P. H. S. Tree planting isn’t a easy answer. Science 368, 580–581 (2020).
Kroeger, T., McDonald, R. I., Boucher, T., Zhang, P. & Wang, L. Where the individuals are: present traits and future potential focused investments in city bushes for PM10 and temperature mitigation in 27 U.S. cities. Landsc. Urban Plan. 177, 277–240 (2018).
McDonald, R. I., Kroeger, T., Zhang, P. & Hamel, P. The worth of US city tree cowl for decreasing heat-related well being impacts and electrical energy consumption. Ecosystems 23, 137–150 (2020).
Heris, M. et al. Piloting city ecosystem accounting for the United States. Ecosyst. Serv. 48, 101226 (2021).
Ellison, D. et al. Trees, forests and water: cool insights for a scorching world. Glob. Environ. Change 43, 51–61 (2017).
Li, R. et al. Time and house meet up with restoration applications that ignore ecosystem service trade-offs. Sci. Adv. 7, eabf8650 (2021).
Gaveau, D. L. A. et al. Rise and fall of forest loss and industrial plantations in Borneo (2000–2017). Conserv. Lett. 12, e12622 (2019).
Griscom, B. W., Goodman, R. C., Burivalova, Z. & Putz, F. E. Carbon and biodiversity impacts of intensive versus intensive tropical forestry. Conserv. Lett. 11, e12362 (2018).
Gabon’s Proposed National RED+ Forest Reference Level (Gabonese Republic, 2021).
Umunay, P., Gregoire, T., Gopalakrishna, T., Ellis, P. & Putz, F. Selective logging emissions and potential emission reductions from reduced-impact logging within the Congo Basin. Ecol. Manag. 437, 360–371 (2019).
Natural Climate Solutions World Atlas (Nature4Climate, accessed 9 December 2020); https://nature4climate.org/n4c-mapper/
Dave, R. et al. Second Bonn Challenge Progress Report: Application of the Barometer in 2018 (IUCN, 2019); https://doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.CH.2019.06.en
Kremen, C. & Merenlender, A. M. Landscapes that work for biodiversity and folks. Science 362, eaau6020 (2018).
Seymour, F. Seeing the forests in addition to the (trillion) bushes in company climate methods. One Earth 2, 390–393 (2020).
Kronenberg, J. & Mieszkowicz, J. Planting bushes for publicity—how a lot are they price? Sustainability 3, 1022–1034 (2011).
Microsoft Carbon Removal: Lessons from an Early Corporate Purchase (Microsoft, 2021).
Toor, I. A., Smith, E. G., Whalen, J. Okay. & Naseem, A. Tree-based intercropping in southern Ontario, Canada. Can. J. Agric. Econ. 60, 141–154 (2012).
Watson, J. E. M., Dudley, N., Segan, D. B. & Hockings, M. The efficiency and potential of protected areas. Nature 515, 67–73 (2014).
zu Ermgassen, S. O. S. E. et al. The ecological outcomes of biodiversity offsets below “no net loss” insurance policies: a world evaluate. Conserv. Lett. 12, e12664 (2019).
Adoption of the Paris Agreement FCCC/CP/2015/L.9/Rev.1 (UNFCCC, 2015).